Only One Place to Go for In-sourcing Challenge
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 04.14.14
In Fisher-Cal Indus., Inc. v. U.S. (Apr. 8, 2014), the D.C. Circuit bounced an incumbent's challenge to the agency's in-sourcing decision. Finding the decision to be part of the procurement process, the court ruled that it was, in essence, a bid protest that could be brought only in the Court of Federal Claims.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.11.26
On July 8, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit vacated the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Rule Concerning Subscriptions and Other Negative Option Plans, commonly known as the “Click-to-Cancel” rule. As detailed in a previous client alert, the rule was intended to regulate negative option plans[1]— such as subscriptions and automatic renewals — by imposing stringent requirements on businesses, including streamlined cancellation processes and enhanced disclosure obligations. The Eighth Circuit vacated the Click-to-Cancel rule because it found that the FTC had failed to comply with mandatory procedural requirements. As a result, the rule is no longer in effect, and businesses are not currently subject to its mandates.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.10.26
UK FCA Proposes New Sustainability Disclosure Rules for Listed Companies
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.09.26
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.09.26
Worried Three’s a Crowd? Decline Intervention at Your Own Peril
