OIG Audit Finds Nearly $900 Million in SDVOSB Set-Aside Contracts Awarded to Ineligible Contractors
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.25.20
In its February 18, 2020 Report, the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) concluded that $876.8 million in service-disabled veteran-owned small-business (SDVOSB) contracts were improperly awarded due to a lack of verification by contracting officials. The audit, which was conducted to determine whether DoD awarded contracts to businesses that actually qualified under the SDVOSB regulations, reviewed awards for 29 self-certified SDVOSBs. Of those 29 contractors, DoD found that 16 had misrepresented their status and wrongfully received a total of 27 SDVOSB set-aside awards valued at $827.8 million in fiscal years 2017 and 2018 alone. Additionally, three other contractors received SDVOSB deals notwithstanding the fact that the Small Business Administration (SBA) had previously found them ineligible for award in response to size protests.
DoD currently relies on businesses’ self-representations of SDVOSB status in the System for Award Management (SAM) when awarding contracts. The Report warns that until additional controls are established, “DoD contracting activities will continue to award SDVOSB contracts to ineligible contractors.” The Report recommends that the DoD Office of Small Business Programs take several steps to remediate the problem, including requiring the submission of documentation establishing SDVOSB status prior to award, and taking action against the contractors determined to have misrepresented their status.
Given this Report, SDVOSBs, large businesses doing business with them, and their service providers (e.g., surety firms) are well advised to pay close attention to eligibility issues.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
