1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |No Prime Liability = No Pass-Through

No Prime Liability = No Pass-Through

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 05.06.08

The Court of Federal Claims in Harper/Nielsen Dillingham, Builders v. U.S. (Apr. 29, 2008) denied a contractor's suit against the government in which it sought to pass through subcontractor claims for cost increases caused by government delays. The court acknowledged that the "Severin doctrine" allows such pass-through claims when the prime contractor is potentially liable to its subcontractor for the damages, but here found the prime could not be liable because the subcontract included an "iron-bound bar" against such liability due to a "no damage for delay" clause.

Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.23.26

CA SB 253: As November 10 deadline approaches, CARB issues letter to potentially covered entities, plaintiffs remind Ninth Circuit of pending decision

One of the two landmark climate-disclosure laws California enacted in 2023 has its first reporting deadline in just over two weeks, amid continued uncertainty regarding its constitutionality.  ...