No Prime Liability = No Pass-Through
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 05.06.08
The Court of Federal Claims in Harper/Nielsen Dillingham, Builders v. U.S. (Apr. 29, 2008) denied a contractor's suit against the government in which it sought to pass through subcontractor claims for cost increases caused by government delays. The court acknowledged that the "Severin doctrine" allows such pass-through claims when the prime contractor is potentially liable to its subcontractor for the damages, but here found the prime could not be liable because the subcontract included an "iron-bound bar" against such liability due to a "no damage for delay" clause.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 11 min read | 05.13.25
The Belgian Competition Authority Steps Up Its Merger Control and Cartel Enforcement Activities
Under its new leadership, the Belgian Competition Authority (BCA) has stepped up its enforcement activities and launched a number of initiatives and investigations that put it at the forefront of competition law developments in the European Union.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.12.25
“Confirm You’re Not a Robot”: AI-Written Briefs Could Lead to Sanctions
Client Alert | 3 min read | 05.12.25
EU Retaliatory Trade Measures Against the U.S. – Public Consultation