1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New U.S. Sectoral Sanctions on Russian Energy and Finance Sectors and the Prospect of New EU Sanctions

New U.S. Sectoral Sanctions on Russian Energy and Finance Sectors and the Prospect of New EU Sanctions

Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.17.14

On July 16, 2014, the United States sharply escalated its sanctions on Russia as a result of Russia's alleged continued involvement in Ukraine, imposing, for the first time, sectoral sanctions on two entities in both the energy and finance sectors. Additionally, the United States sanctioned five individuals and 11 companies under its existing blocking authority and the U.S. Department of Commerce added the same 11 entities to the U.S. Entity List. Simultaneously, the European Union also announced the prospect of new sanctions before the end of July.

Sectoral Sanctions

Exercising its authority under Executive Order 13662 (summarized here) for the first time, the United States created the Sectoral Sanctions Identification List (SSI). The SSI is distinct from OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals List ("SDN" List) and persons identified under the SSI List are not blocked (unless separately designated on the SDN List).

OFAC targeted two sectors of the Russian economy. First, it issued "Directive 1" targeting two companies in the Russian Financial Sector. U.S. persons are prohibited from transacting in, providing financing for, or otherwise dealing in (a) new debt of more than 90 days maturity or (b) new equity of these entities, their property, or their interests in property:

  • Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank) State Corporation (a.k.a. Bank Razvitiya I Vneshneekonomicheskoi Deyatelnosti (Vneshekonombank) Gosudarstvennaya Korporatsiya; Vnesheconombank; VEB)
  • Gazprombank Gas Industry OFSC (a.k.a. Gazprombank OAO; Gazprombank OJSC; Gazprombank Open Joint Stock Company; Gazprombank Otkrytoe Aktsionernoe Obshchestvo; Gazprombank Otkrytoe Ak; GPB, OAO; GPB, OJSC)

Second, under "Directive 2" OFAC targeted two companies in the Russian Energy Sector. U.S. persons are prohibited from transacting in, providing financing for, or otherwise dealing in new debt of more than 90 days maturity of these entities, their property, or their interests in property:

  • Novatek (a.k.a. Finansovo-Investitsionnaya Kompaniya Novafininvest OAO; OAO Novatek)
  • Rosneft (a.k.a. OAO Rosneft Oil Company; Oil Company Rosneft; Open Joint-Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company; Rosneft Oil Company; OJSC Rosneft Oil Company)

Importantly, in a set of published Frequently Asked Questions, OFAC clarified that identification on the SSI does not:

  • Block property of the SSI companies unless separately identified on the SDN List.
  • Prohibit transactions in debt/equity issued prior to July 16, 2014.
  • Prohibit transactions in debt with maturities of 90 days or less.
  • Prohibit the maintenance of correspondent accounts (unless the transaction is prohibited).
  • Prohibit the processing U.S. dollar-clearing transactions.
  • Prohibit transactions in new equity in the Russian energy sector.

Further, OFAC granted a license for derivative products whose value is linked to debt of an SSI with maturity of more than 90 days issued after July 16, 2014 (i.e., debt in which transactions would typically be prohibited for U.S. persons) are authorized by General License 1.

SDN Designations

Second, acting under its authority under Executive Orders 13660 and 13661 (summarized here and here), OFAC added five new individuals and 11 companies to the SDN List:

  • Individuals:
    • BESEDA, Sergey - Commander of the Fifth Service of the FSB; Commander of the Service for Operational Information and International Communications of the FSB; FSB Colonel General; Colonel-General.
    • BORODAI, Aleksandr - The self-declared "prime minister" of the "Donetsk People's Republic" in Ukraine who has vowed to expel Ukraine's army from his new domain and resist any bid to recapture the city (NOTE: Already sanctioned by the EU on July 11).
    • NEVEROV, Sergei Ivanovich - Deputy Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation; Member of the State Duma Committee on Housing Policy and Housing and Communal Services (NOTE: Already sanctioned by the EU (Apr. 28) and Canada (May 12)).
    • SAVELYEV, Oleg Genrikhovich - Minister for Crimean Affairs (NOTE: Already sanctioned by the EU (Apr. 28), Canada (May 12), and Australia (June 19)).
    • SHCHEGOLEV, Igor - Aide to the President of the Russian Federation.
  • Entities
    • DONETSK PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC.
    • FEDERAL STATE UNITARY ENTERPRISE STATE RESEARCH AND PRODUCTION ENTERPRISE BAZALT.
    • FEODOSIYA ENTERPRISE (NOTE: Already sanctioned by Canada on June 21, 2014).
    • JOINT STOCK COMPANY CONCERN RADIO-ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES.
    • JOINT STOCK COMPANY CONCERN SOZVEZDIE.
    • JOINT STOCK COMPANY MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION NPO MASHINOSTROYENIA.
    • JOINT-STOCK COMPANY CONCERN ALMAZ-ANTEY.
    • KALASHNIKOV CONCERN.
    • KONSTRUKTORSKOE BYURO PRIBOROSTROENIYA OTKRYTOE AKTSIONERNOE OBSHCHESTVO.
    • LUHANSK PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC.
    • URALVAGONZAVOD.

These persons are blocked under the authorities of Executive Orders 13660 and 13661 and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from conducting transactions or dealings with any of the newly designated entities and/or other entities identified on the SDN list.

Commerce Entity List Additions

Finally, the U.S. Department of Commerce also added the same 11 entities newly designated by OFAC to the U.S. Entity List. These designations effectively prohibit the export or re-export of U.S.-origin goods, services, or technology subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to these entities by both U.S. and non-U.S. persons.

New EU Sanctions

Also on July 16, the European Council agreed to expand its existing restrictive measures on Russia. The Council did not announce any new designations, but instructed that the "necessary legal instruments" be developed and adopted by the end of July on a "first list of entities and persons" to be designated under the enhanced criteria. The Council also agreed to suspend new financing operations from the European Investment Bank (EIB) as well as to seek to suspend new lending by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....