New Jersey Adopts the Uniform Trade Secrets Act
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.31.12
On January 9, 2012, Governor Chris Christie signed into law the New Jersey Trade Secrets Act ("NJTSA"), which is modeled after the Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("UTSA"). New Jersey joins 45 other states and the District of Columbia in enacting a trade secret statute modeled on the UTSA.
The NJTSA generally follows the UTSA, but with a few key differences.
- The NJTSA defines a "trade secret" more broadly than the UTSA, and extends protection to various other forms in which trade secrets can exist, including a "design, diagram, drawing, invention, plan, procedure, [or] prototype."
- The NJTSA augments, rather than displaces, New Jersey common law remedies for misappropriation of a trade secret.
- The NJTSA is silent as to whether courts must seek uniformity with other states applying the UTSA.
- The NJTSA provides greater clarity about the conduct that may give rise to a trade secrets claim, by expressly distinguishing between "proper" and "improper" means of obtaining trade secrets. Under the NJTSA, acquiring a trade secret by independent invention, reverse engineering, a license, published literature, or public observation is a complete defense.
- The NJTSA provides a presumption in favor of granting protective orders to preserve the secrecy of an alleged trade secret during litigation.
Only four states remain without a statute modeled after the UTSA – Massachusetts, North Carolina, New York, and Texas.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.26.24
The amount of litigation regarding environmental and climate change issues is, perhaps unsurprisingly, growing worldwide.[1] A significant portion of that litigation relates to so-called ‘greenwashing’, ‘climate-washing’ or ‘social-washing’ disputes. In other words, legal cases where people or organisations (often NGOs and consumer groups) accuse companies, banks, financial institutions or others, of making untrue statements. They argue these companies or financial institutions are pretending their products, services or operations are more environmentally-friendly, sustainable, or ethically ‘good’ for society – than is really the case. Perhaps more interestingly, of all the litigation in the environmental and climate change space – complainants bringing greenwashing and social washing cases have, according to some of these reports, statistically the most chance of winning. So, in a nutshell, not only is greenwashing and social washing litigation on the rise, companies and financial institutions are most likely to lose cases in this area.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.25.24
Jewish Community Relations Council Honors Todd Rosenberg and Erika Dickstein
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.25.24
Online Privacy and Safety: The FTC Weighs in on Surveillance, Privacy, and Safeguards
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.25.24
