1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Hike Heads to Court

New Federal Contractor Minimum Wage Hike Heads to Court

Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.11.22

On February 8, 2022, just days after the Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule “Increasing the Minimum Wage for Federal Contractors,” implementing Executive Order (“EO”) 14026, went into effect, five states – Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, Nebraska and South Carolina – filed a lawsuit – in Arizona federal district court, seeking, among other things, a court order invalidating  the federal contractor minimum wage Final Rule and EO 14026.  As we have covered previously, EO 14026 and DOL’s implementing Final Rule require a $15 hourly minimum wage increase for some, but not all, federal contractor and subcontractor employees on new contracts or existing contracts that renewed after January 30, 2022.  These five states argue that EO 14026 exceeds the President’s authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (“FPASA”) and that Congress has not otherwise delegated authority to the Executive Branch to enact a rule with such wide-sweeping effects on the American economy.  By way of example, the States argue that since the current minimum wage in Arizona is $12.80, Nebraska is $9, Idaho and Indiana are $7.25, and South Carolina does not have a state-specific minimum wage, this rule imposes a high economic cost on federal contractors in their respective states.  The plaintiff States are seeking, among other things, a nationwide injunction of the Final Rule and EO 14026.

Two days later, on February 10, 2022, Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, filed a similar challenge to the Final Rule and EO 14026 in Texas federal district court.  Notably, in this case, the plaintiff States are only seeking an injunction as to the enforcement of the Final Rule and EO 14026 against federal contractors operating in their respective jurisdictions.

We will continue to watch these cases, amongst other potential litigation developments, related to the implementation of this Final Rule and EO 14026.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 8 min read | 10.01.25

BIS Issues “Affiliates Rule” to Dramatically Expand Applicability of Entity and Military End-User Lists

On September 29, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) announced a sweeping Interim Final Rule (IFR), (the “Affiliates Rule”) expanding which entities qualify as Entity List or Military End-User entities, thereby subjecting those entities to elevated export control restrictions under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). U.S. export restrictions applicable to entities on the Entity List, Military End-User (MEU) List, and Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN List) now apply to foreign affiliates that are, in the aggregate, owned 50% or more by one or more of the aforementioned entities. An entity that becomes subject to these restrictions because of its ownership structure will be subject to the most restrictive controls that attach to any of its parent entities, regardless of ownership stakes....