1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |New Customs Publication Demands Independent Satisfaction of Customs Value Requirements

New Customs Publication Demands Independent Satisfaction of Customs Value Requirements

Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.31.07

Several weeks ago, U.S. Customs issued another in its series of Informed Compliance Publications for importers, this one concerning transfer pricing. We have included a link below.

There has always existed a tension between international transfer pricing principles under the customs laws (which seek to maximize import value) and under the income tax laws (which seek to minimize cost of goods sold), but for some time there was a tacit recognition by Customs that a tax compliant transfer price would not be challenged by it. The new Customs publication refutes that tacit recognition, and demands independent satisfaction of the customs value requirements. The Customs publication does acknowledge, however, that the same economic and financial analyses which led to a tax compliant transfer price might support a customs compliant transfer price, but that importers would at least have to perform a separate "reasonable care" inquiry under the customs laws and not just assume that the tax-driven transfer price is an acceptable customs value.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.15.26

GAO Indicates Reasonable Conflict of Interest Investigation Must Include Inquiry of Involved Firm

The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) recent decision in Viderity Inc.—Costs, B-424422.5, Sept. 1, 2026, offers useful insight into what constitutes a legally sufficient conflict of interest investigation. The decision arose in an unusual procedural posture: Viderity initially protested, alleging that an agency evaluator had a personal conflict of interest. After the agency took corrective action, Viderity filed a cost entitlement claim requesting that GAO direct the agency to reimburse Viderity’s protest costs. In evaluating that claim, GAO assessed whether Viderity’s underlying protest ground was “clearly meritorious.”...