New Certification of Iran Sanctions Compliance - for You and Your Subsidiaries
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.06.10
On September 29, 2010, the FAR Council published an Interim Rule with request for comment implementing the requirement in the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 ("CISADA") that every contractor certify that neither it, nor any entity owned or controlled by the contractor, engages in any activity for which sanctions could be imposed under section 5 of CISADA, including, for example, sales of goods, services, or technology that could directly and significantly facilitate the maintenance or expansion of Iran's domestic production of refined petroleum products. While the CISADA sanctions extend to both U.S. and foreign persons -- and the FAR Council has extended the certification requirement as broadly as possible to include procurements of commercial items, COTS items, and those below the simplified acquisition threshold -- to avoid any conflict with the U.S.'s commitments under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement and other free trade agreements, contractors furnishing only "designated country" end products under a contract subject to the Trade Agreements Act are exempted from the certification requirement.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25


