1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |NHTSA Punts Again On Requiring Rearview Cameras

NHTSA Punts Again On Requiring Rearview Cameras

Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.23.13


Recent Happenings in APRM
July 2013

On June 24, 2013, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced a further delay in finalizing a rule requiring that all new vehicles be equipped with a rearview camera designed to avoid "backover" crashes. Though federal law required NHTSA to promulgate regulations to mitigate the risk of backover crashes by February 2011, NHTSA's rulemaking has been delayed multiple times under authority allowing the Secretary of Transportation to modify this timeline if he determines that the statutory deadline cannot be met. In the letter to Congress announcing this most recent delay, the Secretary said that the rearview camera rule likely will not be finalized until January 2015, meaning that compliance would not be required until model year 2017.

While delaying promulgation of a rearview camera rule, NHTSA simultaneously reported on the importance of the rule's requirements. On June 26, the agency issued a proposed rule announcing its plan to begin including backup camera ratings as part of the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), to encourage manufacturers to install rearview cameras voluntarily. Under the proposal, rearview video systems will be listed as a "safety feature" for each vehicle model that is equipped with such a system. If NHTSA is able to verify that a vehicle model's rearview video system satisfies certain criteria, the website will additionally recognize the vehicle model as possessing a "Recommended Advanced Technology Feature." To receive the agency's recommendation, a rearview camera system must satisfy the following criteria:

(1) Show a visual image of a minimum area of a 20-foot by 10-foot zone directly behind the vehicle;
(2) Show the test objects in the image within a visual angle of at least 5 minutes of arc; and
(3) Show this area within 2.0 seconds after the vehicle transmission is shifted into reverse.

These criteria are the same as those NHTSA proposed in the delayed rule that requires rearview cameras in all vehicles.

If the changes to NCAP are finalized, the agency expects to have its recommendations available online beginning in June 2014. This proposed addition to NCAP is separate from the other changes to the program currently under consideration involving, for example, automatic collision notification systems, automatic braking systems, and improved test dummies.

In addition to the delay in finalizing a rearview camera rule, NHTSA is also behind schedule on publishing a number of other final rules, including those regarding the sound levels of hybrid and electric vehicles and electronic data recorders. But with a newly confirmed Secretary of Transportation, former Charlotte, North Carolina mayor Anthony Foxx, it remains to be seen whether NHTSA's priorities will shift in the

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....