Massachusetts Finalizes Regulations and Code of Conduct for Medical Device and Pharmaceutical Relationships with Health Care Practitioners
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.13.09
This week, Massachusetts approved regulations creating a new state-authored marketing code of conduct for interactions between health care practitioners and pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers. The regulations are effective on July 1, 2009.
The regulations require manufacturers to designate a compliance officer and establish compliance and training programs. The regulations also require manufacturers to adopt a code of conduct, which incorporates voluntary industry codes adopted by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and the Advanced Medical Technology Association. Notably, the state-mandated code of conduct incorporates requirements in addition to these two voluntary industry codes and explicitly restricts a broad variety of conduct, including a ban on providing items such as pens and mugs.
The subject of much debate among stakeholders, the new regulations also establish reporting requirements for certain payments made to "covered recipients," including mandating that manufacturers report certain payments exceeding a $50 threshold made to healthcare practitioners, hospitals, nursing homes, pharmacists and health benefit plan administrators. The $50 limit is not cumulative but calculated on an individual transactional basis. The law does provide for several disclosure exemptions, such as certain payments made in conjunction with research and clinical trials, demonstration or evaluation units, and rebates and discounts; however, several categories of indirect payments are not exempt, including charitable donations to universities or hospitals, sponsorship of continuing medical education, and third-party professional or scientific meetings or conferences. The first disclosure reports are due on July 1, 2010.
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Client Alert | 5 min read | 11.26.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
