Libya Sanctions Redux - Qadhafi on the Outs Again
Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.28.11
In response to the increasingly violent situation in Libya, in the past few days the United States, the United Nations Security Council, and the European Union have successively announced targeted sanctions against Libya and senior members of the Libyan government aimed at freezing the regime's assets and limiting access to weapons.
U.S. Sanctions
On Friday, February 25, President Obama signed an as-yet unnumbered Executive Order declaring a national emergency to deal with the "unusual and extraordinary threat" to U.S. interests created by the Libyan government's "wanton violence against unarmed civilians." The Executive Order imposes blocking sanctions on all transactions involving assets within U.S. jurisdiction of the "Government of Libya, its agencies, instrumentalities, and controlled entities, and the Central Bank of Libya," and sanctions the personal assets of Colonel Qadhafi, four of his children, and other entities that may be determined to meet certain enumerated criteria. The Executive Order also prohibits making any "contribution or provision of funds, goods or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person" whose interests are blocked as well as the receipt of funds from any such person.
Concurrent with the issuance of the Executive Order, the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control issued a tersely-worded General License authorizing all transactions "with financial institutions owned or controlled by the Government of Libya that are organized under the laws of a country other than Libya." Subsequently, on February 26, the Department of State's Directorate of Defense Trade Controls suspended all licenses previously issued under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations for exports to Libya.
UN Sanctions
On Saturday, February 26, the UN Security Council unanimously approved Resolution 1970, which imposes multilateral sanctions on the Qadhafi regime. The sanctions include a total arms embargo, as well as a travel ban and asset freeze on six members of the Qadhafi family, entities "owned or controlled by them," and any other individuals "involved in or complicit in ordering, controlling, or otherwise directing, the commission of serious human rights abuses against persons in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya." The travel ban and asset freeze provisions exempt certain activities from the sanctions, such as those preapproved by the UNSC or for demonstrated humanitarian need.
EU Sanctions
Today, Monday, February 28, the Council of the European Union took steps to implement the UNSC Resolution by adopting a general ban on the supply of arms, issuing a visa ban, and ordering the freezing of assets of members of the Qadhafi family and certain senior government officials. Unilaterally, the Council of the EU also prohibited trade with Libya in equipment that can be used for internal repression. The text of the decision is not yet available but is expected to be published in the Official Journal of the EU in the coming days.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
On August 19, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing — the practice of companies using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, discounts, coupons, or other incentives. The proposed statement, which is open for public comment for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, marks a major step up in the FTC’s focus on data-driven pricing strategies and puts businesses across industries on notice that undisclosed or inadequately disclosed personalized pricing will not be tolerated. Importantly, while the proposed statement is not a binding legal requirement and does not create new legal obligations, it serves as an enforcement warning that the FTC is prepared to use its existing enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (Section 5) and is also a potential harbinger of rulemaking. Businesses that engage in — or are considering — personalized pricing should carefully assess their disclosure practices and data collection procedures against the standards articulated in this statement.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.19.26
CMS’s Final Rule Bans Federal Medicaid Funding for Youth Gender-Affirming Care
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.19.26


