Justice Department Approves Delta-Northwest Merger
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.31.08
On October 29, 2008, the Department of Justice's (DOJ) Antitrust Division announced that it was closing its six-month investigation on the proposed merger of Delta, the third largest U.S. airline, and Northwest, the fifth largest U.S. airline, after finding no antitrust objections. The DOJ stated that the proposed merger "is likely to produce substantial and credible efficiencies that will benefit U.S. consumers and is not likely to substantially lessen competition." Further, "[t]he two airlines currently compete with a number of other legacy and low cost airlines in the provision of scheduled air passenger service on the vast majority of nonstop and connecting routes where they compete with each others. In addition, the merger likely will result in efficiencies such as cost savings in airport operations, information technology, supply chain economics, and fleet optimization that will benefit consumers." Delta and Northwest had argued the deal would insulate the combined company from rising fuel costs that reached even the nation's biggest airlines. Justin Baer, Financial Times.
That same day, Delta Air Lines completed its $2.8 billion acquisition of Northwest to create the world's largest airline. The combined airline will keep Delta's name, Atlanta headquarters, and chief executive, Richard Anderson. News media speculated that a combined Delta-Northwest "may still pressure rivals such as United Airlines and American Airlines to pursue deals of their own" and that "the Delta-Northwest merger may serve as a template for other airlines." Financial Times.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
