Is CFIUS One of the Few Things Crossing the Atlantic?
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.16.20
To date, the U.K. government has rarely used its power to intervene in M&A deals on the grounds of public interest, with only 12 transactions having been reviewed since 2013. This may be about to change. The National Security and Investment Bill (the Bill) if enacted would substantially reform the U.K.’s foreign investment rules, introducing a hybrid system of mandatory and voluntary notifications on grounds of national security similar to reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS). The Bill, likely to become law in early 2021, is projected to lead to the notification of potentially 2,000 transactions per year. Critically, transactions completed on or after 12 November 2020 may be retroactively reviewed by the U.K. government once the Bill is passed into law.
Key points on the proposed regime:
- 17 sectors are subject to mandatory notification, including defence, energy, AI and other technologies.
- There are criminal and civil sanctions for breaches of mandatory notification obligations and other non-compliance, with fines of up to 5% of worldwide turnover or £10 million and up to 5 years imprisonment for directors.
- Transactions under the mandatory regime which complete without clearance will be void.
- Transactions can be retrospectively ‘called in’ for review up to five years after closing.
- There will be no turnover or market share thresholds below which transactions will fall outside the regime.
- Certain asset acquisitions (e.g. land, moveable property and intellectual property) will fall under the regime, as well as acquisitions of companies and other businesses.
The proposed regime is clearly an important development for M&A and FDI transactions involving the U.K. As a first step, overseas investors into the U.K. may wish to consider whether any of their recent transactions could be retroactively reviewed.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.30.25
Are All Baby Products Related? TTAB Says “No”
The United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or Board) recently issued a refreshed opinion in the trademark dispute Naterra International, Inc. v. Samah Bensalem, where Naterra International, Inc. petitioned the TTAB to cancel Samah Bensalem’s registration for the mark BABIES' MAGIC TEA based on its own BABY MAGIC mark. On remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the TTAB reconsidered an expert’s opinion about relatedness of goods based on the concept of “umbrella branding” and found that the goods are unrelated and therefore again denied the petition for cancellation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.30.25
Investor Advisory Committee Recommends SEC Disclosure Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.29.25
FYI – GAO Finds Key Person “Available” Despite Accepting Employment with a Different Company
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.29.25
More Than Math: How Desjardins Recognizes AI Innovations as Patent-Eligible Technology



