International Trade Bulletin - Volume 1, Issue 9
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.10.06
Inside this issue:
- EUROPE IN THE SPOTLIGHT
- EU Anti-Dumping: The Latest Series of Anti-Dumping Measures Proposed by the EU Clearly Show the Fingerprints of a More Liberalized Policy
- Market Access: The European Commission Formally Kicked Off Its Strategic Review of EU-China Trade Relations on 7th July With a High-Profile Conference in Brussels
- CHINA IN THE SPOTLIGHT
- U.S. EXPORT CONTROLS: US-India Agreement May Give U.S.-India Tech Transfers A Yellow Light
- U.S. SANCTIONS: State Department Shifts Policies Toward Venezuela and Libya on Trade Sanctions
- TECHNOLOGY: New U.S. Legislation Could Impose Significant Penalties Against U.S. Companies that Provide Information to Internet-Restricting Countries Such as China
- CUSTOMS: Potential Backlog in U.S. Validations Causes Concern for C-TPAT Members
- TRANSPORTATION: Supporters of U.S. Department of Transport's (“DOT”) Foreign Control Proposal Seek Changes to Expand Foreign Control While Opponents Argue the Rule Already Permits Too Much Foreign Control
- ANTI-BOYCOTT OAC Issues Proposed Anti-Boycott Penalty Guidelines
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.20.26
SCOTUS Holds IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, negating the President’s ability to impose tariffs under IEEPA. The case stemmed from President Trump’s invocation of IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China, and other countries, citing national emergencies. Challengers argued—and the Court agreed—that IEEPA does not delegate tariff authority to the President. The power to tariff is vested in Congress by the Constitution and cannot be delegated to the President absent express authority from Congress.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 02.20.26
Section 5949 Proposed Rule Puts the FAR Council's Chips on the Table
Client Alert | 5 min read | 02.20.26
Trump Administration Pursues MFN Pricing for Prescription Drugs
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.19.26
Proposed NY Legislation May Mean Potential Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Crypto Firms
