Government Relief From COVID-19 Impacts on Federal Contracts and Grants
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.23.20
In the last several days, the federal government released a number of guidance documents designed to ease the impacts of COVID-19 on government contractors and grantees. The guidance is summarized below:
Contractors:
- DoD Progress Payments Increase to 90% for Large Businesses and 95% for Small Businesses under DFARS Clause. On March 20, DoD issued guidance that raises the progress payment recovery rate from 80% to 90% for large businesses, and from 90% to 95% for small businesses. The DoD memorandum requires Defense contracting officers to immediately use deviations for DFARS 252.232-7004 (DoD Progress Payment Rates) and FAR 52.232-16 (Progress Payments) permitting for these larger percentage progress payments. Contractors should encourage Contracting Officers to amend their current contracts with these revised clauses in order to take advantage of these increases.
- DoD Permits Maximum Telework Flexibility for Contractors. On March 20, DoD issued guidance to Defense contracting officers to provide maximum telework flexibility for contractors. Contracting officers should work with program managers and requirements owners to permit flexibility in a contractor’s place of performance without mission degradation.
USAID Awardees:
- Crowell & Moring has published a blog post discussing extensive COVID-related guidance specifically for USAID.
OMB Guidance for Contractors and Federal Grant Recipients:
- Crowell & Moring has also published two blog posts covering OMB guidance for federal contractors and for federal grant recipients.
The entire Crowell team is standing ready to assist affected contractors and federal award recipients impacted by COVID-19. We wish you continued good health.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25





