Fundamental Shift in GSA Schedule Contract Pricing?
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.08.08
The Multiple Award Schedule ("MAS") Advisory Panel, established in March 2008 to review pricing and price reduction provisions of the MAS program, has voted to recommend that GSA eliminate, on a gradual basis, the Price Reduction Clause for purchases of both products and services under the Schedule and adopt different and better mechanisms to achieve pricing transparency and competition at both the Schedule contract level and task/delivery order level. The Panel will present its recommendations to the GSA Administrator later this year.
-----------------------
Crowell & Moring Government Contracts Group is pleased to announce a second bullet point service that will focus exclusively on GSA Schedule contracting. GSA Schedule contracts have unique requirements, risks, and rewards, and the products and services purchased by federal and state governments through this contracting vehicle are expanding in scope and volume.
The GSA Schedule Bullet Points will alert you to:
- changes in the law and policy affecting GSA Schedule contracts
- new case law affecting GSA Schedule contracts
- seminars and publications offered by Crowell & Moring of interest to GSA Schedule contract holders
Please respond to this email if you would like to be included in this new bullet point service. Feel free to forward this invitation to others who might be interested in receiving our GSA Schedule Bullet Points.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.15.26
GAO Indicates Reasonable Conflict of Interest Investigation Must Include Inquiry of Involved Firm
The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) recent decision in Viderity Inc.—Costs, B-424422.5, Sept. 1, 2026, offers useful insight into what constitutes a legally sufficient conflict of interest investigation. The decision arose in an unusual procedural posture: Viderity initially protested, alleging that an agency evaluator had a personal conflict of interest. After the agency took corrective action, Viderity filed a cost entitlement claim requesting that GAO direct the agency to reimburse Viderity’s protest costs. In evaluating that claim, GAO assessed whether Viderity’s underlying protest ground was “clearly meritorious.”
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.15.26
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.14.26
AI in Life Sciences: Ten Legal Considerations and Risks of AI Use in Drug Discovery and Development
Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.14.26
Mental Health Parity Bulletin Restates Best Practices for Evaluating Compliance
