Fundamental Shift in GSA Schedule Contract Pricing?
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.08.08
The Multiple Award Schedule ("MAS") Advisory Panel, established in March 2008 to review pricing and price reduction provisions of the MAS program, has voted to recommend that GSA eliminate, on a gradual basis, the Price Reduction Clause for purchases of both products and services under the Schedule and adopt different and better mechanisms to achieve pricing transparency and competition at both the Schedule contract level and task/delivery order level. The Panel will present its recommendations to the GSA Administrator later this year.
-----------------------
Crowell & Moring Government Contracts Group is pleased to announce a second bullet point service that will focus exclusively on GSA Schedule contracting. GSA Schedule contracts have unique requirements, risks, and rewards, and the products and services purchased by federal and state governments through this contracting vehicle are expanding in scope and volume.
The GSA Schedule Bullet Points will alert you to:
- changes in the law and policy affecting GSA Schedule contracts
- new case law affecting GSA Schedule contracts
- seminars and publications offered by Crowell & Moring of interest to GSA Schedule contract holders
Please respond to this email if you would like to be included in this new bullet point service. Feel free to forward this invitation to others who might be interested in receiving our GSA Schedule Bullet Points.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
