For Whom Does the Appeal Clock Toll? Vitiation vs. Finality
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 01.12.16
In Guardian Angels Med. Serv. Dogs Inc. v. U.S. (Jan. 8, 2016), the Federal Circuit held that a CO's request to evaluate additional information after a default termination "vitiated the finality" of the termination and reset the 12-month appeal clock, even though the CO neither received new information nor spent any time reconsidering her decision. Reversing the CFC's dismissal of the appeal as time-barred, the court held that, when a CO "evince[s] a clear willingness to consider additional evidence," the appeal period begins anew, rather than merely being suspended, and explained that "whether the contracting officer 'spends time' considering the request is not the proper standard."
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 04.27.26
Deadlock Broken: EU Adopts 20th Russia Sanctions Package
The EU has adopted its 20th package of sanctions in connection with Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine, resolving a prolonged internal political deadlock that had been caused by vetoes from Hungary and Slovakia. The package amends Regulations 833/2014, 269/2014, and 765/2006 and the respective Council Decisions and Implementing Regulations. The texts entered into force on 24 April 2026. They are available through this link.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 04.27.26
Drift Protocol Exploit: Why “Social Trust” Is the Newest Cybersecurity Gap
Client Alert | 11 min read | 04.27.26
EU Pharma Package: Access Conditionalities and Shortage Measures Compromise Proposal
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.27.26
Gaming Addiction Litigation: Turner v. Epic Games & Roblox and What It Means for the Industry


