For Whom Does the Appeal Clock Toll? Vitiation vs. Finality
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 01.12.16
In Guardian Angels Med. Serv. Dogs Inc. v. U.S. (Jan. 8, 2016), the Federal Circuit held that a CO's request to evaluate additional information after a default termination "vitiated the finality" of the termination and reset the 12-month appeal clock, even though the CO neither received new information nor spent any time reconsidering her decision. Reversing the CFC's dismissal of the appeal as time-barred, the court held that, when a CO "evince[s] a clear willingness to consider additional evidence," the appeal period begins anew, rather than merely being suspended, and explained that "whether the contracting officer 'spends time' considering the request is not the proper standard."
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 04.07.26
EU Pharma Package: Fiscal Imports in the Supply Chain Compromise Proposal
In our fourth alert in this EU Pharma Package Series, we provided an analysis of the long-standing but increasingly debated issue of fiscal imports in the pharmaceutical supply chain and the EU’s evolving approach to this issue.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.02.26
Client Alert | 7 min read | 04.02.26
Reducing Your Exposure: Liability Limitations for Cybersecurity-Compliant Organizations
Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.01.26


