Follow Up: White House Issues Order under Defense Production Act as Part of COVID Response
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.27.20
On March 23, 2020, the President signed an “Executive Order on Preventing Hoarding of Health and Medical Resources to Respond to the Spread of COVID-19” delegating additional authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (“DPA”), which builds on Executive Order (EO) No. 13909, issued March 18, 2020, which we discussed here. The new EO delegated to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) the authority to prevent hoarding of health and medical resources necessary to respond to the spread of COVID-19 by: (1) prescribing conditions for accumulation of such resources; and (2) designating any material as scarce or threatened by excessive accumulation as to reasonable business, personal, or home consumption, or for purpose of resale at excessive prices (i.e., price gouging). These designations, in turn, trigger the prohibitions against hoarding. The EO also delegated the authority to gather information, such as information about how supplies of such resources are distributed throughout the nation, through use of investigations, records, reports, and subpoenas. The DPA and its implementing regulations and orders carry criminal penalties for noncompliance, as well as the possibility of injunctive relief in certain circumstances.
Subsequently, HHS issued a notice, effective March 25, designating fifteen materials as “scarce materials or threatened materials,” including items such as N-95 and other filtering facepiece respirators, ventilators, disinfecting devices, and a variety of health-related personal protective equipment (“PPE”). Under the notice, the term “materials” includes raw materials (including critical components), products, and items of supply; and any technical information or services ancillary to the use of any such materials, commodities, articles, components, products, or items. The term “scarce materials or threatened materials” means health or medical resources, or any of their essential components, determined by the Secretary to be needed to respond to the spread of COVID-19 and which are, or are likely to be, in short supply or the supply of which would be threatened by hoarding. Designated scarce materials or threatened materials are subject to periodic review by the Secretary. The designation self-terminates in 120 days unless superseded by a subsequent notice.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25






