Finally—A Regulatory Pathway for Biosimilars in the United States
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.26.10
Lost in much of the political fanfare surrounding healthcare reform is that, for the first time, a regulatory pathway for the approval of biosimilar medicines was created when President Obama signed healthcare reform legislation into law. While the European Union has had a regulatory pathway for biosimilars since 2006, the United States, which is by far the world's largest potential market for biosimilars, has not--until now.
The Senate Healthcare Reform Bill that was signed by the President this week will be unchanged by any pending House of Representative amendments. The biosimilar regulatory pathway is now law.The biosimilar regulatory pathway is based on the innovator's or "reference product's" prior FDA approval and determination of safety, purity and potency. Biosimilar applications will be reviewed by the same FDA division as the reference product. To be approved, the application must satisfy two standards:
- Biosimilar-requires analytics demonstrating that product is "highly similar", preclinical, clinical (including immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics) studies, any of which may be waived by the FDA; and
- Interchangeability--meeting above biosimilar requirement and (a)"expected to produce same clinical result …in any given patient"; and (b) risk of "safety or diminished efficacy of alternating or switching between use of the [biosimilar] and reference product is not greater than the risk of using the reference product" alone.
Other key features of the new law are
- No biosimilar applicant can file sooner than 4 years after the reference product is first licensed (4.5 if pediatric request);
- 12 years of exclusivity for reference products from "first licensure";
- 1 year of exclusivity after first commercial marketing for first biosimilar applicant;
- Confidential document exchange and good faith negotiation between applicant and reference product patent owners before patent litigation;
- 180 day "Notice of Commercial Marketing" by biosimilar applicant to reference product owner prior to marketing;
- But unlike small molecule generics, there will be no "Orange Book" Listing
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25


