FinCEN Issues ID Requirement for Cash Buyers of High-End Manhattan and Miami Real Estate
Client Alert | 2 min read | 01.13.16
On January 13, the Department of the Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced that it has issued Geographic Targeting Orders (GTOs) for Manhattan and Miami-Dade County, temporarily requiring certain U.S. title insurance companies to identify and report natural persons who use legal entities to acquire high-end residential properties without external financing.
FinCEN already requires Residential Mortgage Lenders and Originators (RMLOs) to have AML programs in place and to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). The new GTOs are an expansion of FinCEN's efforts to mitigate money laundering in the real estate sector.
The GTOs require that the beneficial owners of legal entity purchasers be identified and reported in deals valued at more than $3 million in Manhattan and more than $1 million in Miami-Dade County. The orders define beneficial owners as individuals who, directly or indirectly, own 25 percent or more of the equity interests of the entity that bought the property, a definition of beneficial ownership similar to one FinCEN has proposed in a draft rule on customer due diligence. FinCEN is covering certain title insurance companies because title insurance is common in real estate transactions.
Information reported will be shared with law enforcement agencies, providing insight into the natural persons involved in transactions vulnerable to abuse for money laundering. FinCEN anticipates that the GTOs will make it more difficult for individual purchasers behind the covered transactions to disguise their involvement, mitigating the key vulnerability of such "all cash" transactions.
The program only covers two markets and is of limited duration, taking effect on March 1, 2016 and expiring on August 27, 2016. If FinCEN finds suspicious activity in many sales, it reportedly plans to develop permanent reporting requirements for the entire U.S. real estate market.
The Bank Secrecy Act provides for the imposition of an AML program requirement on "persons involved in real estate closing and settlements" because such persons are part of the Act's broad definition of "financial institutions." However, FinCEN has exempted such persons and certain other businesses defined as "financial institutions" under the Act from this requirement while it studies the extent to which AML programs are appropriate for those industries. In 2003, FinCEN published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making specifically to consider the imposition of AML requirements on persons involved in real estate closing and settlements, in which it recognized that real estate had been and might continue to be used for money laundering, but never issued a final rule.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26

