FEMA Allocates Certain Scarce PPE for Domestic Use and Restricts Exports
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.08.20
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), under the Department of Homeland Security, has released a Temporary Final Rule that invokes the Defense Production Act (DPA) to allocate certain Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for domestic use and prohibit exportation of PPE from the U.S. without express FEMA approval. The mechanics of implementation remain somewhat unclear, but the rule provides for Customs and Border Protection to detain outbound shipments of PPE until FEMA determines whether to return the shipment for domestic use, issue a DPA-covered order against the PPE, or allow the export of all or part of the order in the interest of national defense. Covered PPE (“covered material”) includes:
- N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators
- Other Filtering Facepiece Respirators
- Elastomeric, air-purifying respirators and appropriate particulate filters/cartridges
- PPE surgical masks
- PPE gloves or surgical gloves
FEMA commits to make determinations “quickly” and “within a reasonable time of being notified of an intended shipment.” The rule exempts covered material shipments made by or on behalf of U.S. manufacturers with continuous export agreements with customers in other countries since at least January 1, 2020, provided that at least 80% of the manufacturer’s domestic production of covered material was distributed in the U.S. in the preceding 12 months. Those violating the rule may be subject to a fine up to $10,000, imprisonment for up to one year, and/or an injunction. The rule will be effective when published in the Federal Register, currently scheduled for April 10.
Contacts

Partner
He/Him/His
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2500
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1.202.624.2548
- Boston
- D | +1.781.795.4700
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.06.25
Executive Branch Focus on Federally Funded Inventions
In recent months the executive branch has indicated a willingness to assert control over intellectual property funded by federal research dollars in novel ways. This could potentially include leveraging its march-in rights under the Bayh-Dole Act.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.06.25
Key Takeaways to the State Attorneys General - Election Day 2025
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.06.25
Supreme Court Oral Argument on Presidential Tariff Authority
Client Alert | 13 min read | 11.06.25

