FDA Recommends Social Distancing in Food Facilities to Prevent the Spread of COVID-19
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.08.20
Continuing its efforts to ensure a continuous and safe supply of food during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, on April 5, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) updated its Questions & Answers for Industry on food safety and COVID-19 to address social distancing in food production/processing facilities and retail food establishments where employees typically work in close proximity.
In light of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) recommendation that individuals should maintain a distance of 6 feet from others, FDA suggests that food production/processing facilities and retail food establishments should evaluate their operations and determine if changes can be made to increase employee separation. However, FDA recognizes that in many facilities, maintaining a minimum 6-foot distance between employees is not possible.
To address this issue, FDA recommends that food production/processing facilities and retail food establishments ensure proper hygiene practices, including frequent and proper handwashing, regular cleaning of all surfaces, and wearing face coverings under appropriate circumstances. FDA further urges collaboration with state and local officials to ensure an appropriate response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Finally, FDA encourages sick employees to comply with CDC guidelines, which urges sick individuals to stay at home, except to get medical care. With increased reports of workers in both manufacturing and retail facilities falling ill, we expect FDA will continue to make best practice recommendations to keep critical food supply chains open.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.02.25
On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the USPSTF and its role in identifying preventive services for coverage under the ACA in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management.[1]In the case, the Supreme Court considered whether the Secretary of HHS’s appointment of USPSTF members without the advice and consent of the Senate complied with the Appointments Clause in Article II of the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court found that USPSTF members were “inferior Officers” under the Appointments Clause who did not require Senate confirmation because the Secretary of HHS had the authority to remove USPSTF members at will and “to directly review and block Task Force recommendations before they take effect.” The Supreme Court therefore affirmed that the USPSTF as currently structured may legally recommend preventive services for coverage without cost-sharing requirements under the ACA.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.02.25
USPTO's Upcoming Changes to the Accelerated Examination Program
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.01.25
DoD Establishes New DOGE Approval Process for ITC&MS and A&AS Contracts
Client Alert | 10 min read | 07.01.25
Ninth Circuit Decision Underscores Increasing False Claims Act Risks to U.S. Importers