"Excessive" Pass-Through Charges Defined And Prohibited
Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.15.09
Implementing statutory requirements, FAR has been amended with interim rules (74 Fed. Reg. 52852 (Oct. 14, 2009)) that prohibit "excessive" pass-through charges on cost-reimbursement contracts with civilian agencies in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold and on all types of contracts with DOD in excess of $650,0000 (except for fixed-price contracts awarded based on adequate price competition or for commercial items), to require that the provisions be flowed down to subcontractors, to require that covered contractors and subcontractors report specific information about pass-through charges (indirect costs and profit) either in their proposals when they intend to subcontract more than 70 percent of the contract or subcontract effort or after award when they actually subcontract more than 70 percent of the effort, and to provide that excessive pass-throughs are "unallowable" on flexibly-priced contracts and justify a price adjustment when included in the price of fixed-price contracts. "Excessive" pass-through charges exist when a covered prime contractor or higher-tier subcontractor adds no or negligible value and charges indirect costs or profit (other than indirect costs and profit for managing the subcontractor) on work performed by a subcontractor and the contracting officer makes a determination that the pass-through costs are excessive, normally in evaluating the proposal, but also in evaluating information that contractors and subcontractors are required to report after award when subcontracting plans change sufficiently to exceed the 70 percent reporting threshold.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.15.25
On August 19, 2025, the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance (“Senate Finance Committee”) sent Paul Atkins, Chairman, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a letter calling on the SEC to investigate White River Energy Corp (“White River”). In the letter, the Senate Finance Committee confirmed a criminal investigation into White River related to the sale of so-called “tribal tax credits” that according to both Congress and the IRS, do not exist. The letter further states that White River allegedly earned millions of dollars selling these credits and has not been forthcoming with investors regarding the existence of the criminal investigation. According to the Senate Finance Committee, White River has failed to file financial disclosure documents with the SEC since March 15, 2024, missing six consecutive reporting periods. The letter instructs White River to disclose the existence of the DOJ criminal tax investigation, and calls on the SEC to take action if White River fails to do so.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.12.25
SBA’s OHA Further Defines Extraordinary Action in SDVOSB Appeal
Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.11.25
U.S. Department of Commerce Partially Relaxes Export Controls on Syria
Client Alert | 9 min read | 09.11.25