European Commission imposes record € 1.06 billion antitrust fine on Intel
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.14.09
The European Commission yesterday fined Intel € 1.06 billion (around US$ 1.4 billion) for abuse of its dominant position in certain CPU computer chips (x86 CPUs) between 2002 and 2007. This exceeds the previous record fine for anticompetitive behavior of € 896 imposed last year on Saint Gobain for its participation in the car glass cartel as well as the fine of € 899 imposed last year on Microsoft for non-compliance with the Commission abuse decision.
The Commission made two findings of abuse against Intel:
- first that it granted hidden rebates to computer manufacturers on condition that they obtain all or almost all of their x86 chip requirements from Intel, and paid a major retailer (Media Markt) to stock only Intel-based computers; and
- second that it paid computer manufacturers to delay the launch of computers containing chips manufactured by its main competitor AMD.
These practices were found to undermine the ability of Intel's competitors to compete effectively and harm innovation. In line with its recently published Guidance Paper on abuse of dominance cases, the Commission assessed whether Intel's behavior would harm an 'as efficient' competitor (i.e. a competitor able to manufacture chips as cost efficiently as Intel) and has concluded that it would.
It appears that Intel had actively sought to conceal its infringement, among others by excluding the abusive terms from written contracts with computer manufacturers, and this - together with the fact that Intel's practices constitute well established infringements of EU law - may in part explain the scale of the fine.
The fine is equivalent of 4.15% of Intel's 2008 worldwide turnover. The maximum fine that the Commission can impose in antitrust cases is 10% of worldwide turnover.
Click for the Commission's press release and Q&A on the fine.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.05.26
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed another revision to independent contractor regulations, one that would provide for more leeway in classifying workers as contractors. DOL’s proposed rule, published on February 26, 2026, would rescind the Biden DOL’s March 2024 independent contractor regulation and reinstate a framework substantially tracking the prior Trump rule of January 2021. The proposed rule would also apply the narrower analysis to worker classifications under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (MSPA). The comment period closes in late April 2026; until then, the 2024 rule remains in effect for purposes of private litigation.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 03.05.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 03.04.26
Sixth Circuit Finds EFAA Arbitration Bar to Entire Case — Not Just Sexual Harassment Claims
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.02.26
