European Commission imposes Euro 20 million fine for early implementation of a merger ('Gun-jumping')
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.12.09
On 10 June, the European Commission imposed a Euro 20 million fine on the Belgian electricity producer Electrabel for implementing a notifiable merger without having received prior approval under the EC Merger Regulation ('ECMR').
The issue came to light when Electrabel notified its acquisition of CNR, a French electricity company, to the Commission in March 2008. The Commission cleared the acquisition, without an in-depth investigation of the substantive competition issues, in April 2008. However, it continued to investigate the date on which Electrabel first acquired control of CNR. Ultimately, it concluded that control had first been acquired in December 2003, when Electrabel acquired a tranche of shares from a third electricity producer, EDF of France. Although Electrabel's shareholding in CNR remained just below 50%, it obtained an effective majority of votes at CNR's shareholders' meetings based on past attendance rates. In addition, Electrabel became the only industrial shareholder in CNR and took over from EDF the operational management of CNR power plants and the marketing of its electricity. The Commission concluded this was sufficient to give Electrabel de facto control of CNR and, as a result, to trigger a filing requirement under the ECMR.
This is by far the largest fine imposed by the Commission for 'gun-jumping'. In principle, implementation of a merger subject to mandatory notification under the ECMR without first obtaining clearance from the Commission may expose the companies involved to fines of up to 10% of total worldwide group turnover. However, such fines have historically been extremely rare and relatively small. The Commission has only imposed such fines on two previous occasions, the last one in 1999, and the previous highest fine was Euro 219,000 for failure to notify and putting into effect of three transactions in breach of Article 7 ECMR.
The fine appears to be another signal that the Commission is taking an increasingly hard line on gun-jumping issues. In December 2007, the Commission conducted its first ever 'dawn raids' under the ECMR on two PVC manufacturers in the UK suspected of gun jumping.
Click for the Commission’s press release announcing the fine.
Click for a set of FAQs issued by the Commission in relation to the fine.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
