1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |EU Publishes 2014 RAPEX Report

EU Publishes 2014 RAPEX Report

Client Alert | 4 min read | 04.27.15

On March 23, 2015, the European Commission (EC) announced its report on the EU's Rapid Alert System for non-food (RAPEX) for 2014. RAPEX, established by the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD), is the EU's system for exchanging information amongst and notifying member states, the EC, and the public about purportedly dangerous products and measures taken to address those dangers. RAPEX covers products posing a "serious risk," according to the EU's risk assessment methodology. Unlike the more diffuse safety and recall regulatory structure in the U.S., the European system captures hazardous consumer and professional products, motor vehicles, and cosmetics but excludes food, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices.

For 2014, the EC reported the highest number of RAPEX notifications—2,435—a slight increase from 2013 (2,364). Those notifications resulted in actions including market withdrawal, recall, ban on sales, and rejection of imports. 

The RAPEX website also received increased visitor traffic in 2014, which the EC attributes to the revamping of the site. Those changes included new search tools, making the site more user-friendly for consumers and businesses.

Key figures from the report include:

  • Product Categories. The top two most notified product categories, accounting for more than half of all notifications in 2014, were toys (28 percent) and clothing, textiles, and fashion items (23 percent). Rounding out the top five product categories notified in 2014 were electrical appliances and equipment (9 percent), motor vehicles (8 percent), childcare articles and children's equipment (3 percent), and lighting products (3 percent).
  • Hazards. The top five product risks in the notifications were: injuries (707 notifications); chemical (674 notifications); choking (313 notifications); electric shock (295 notifications); and strangulation (258 notifications). For chemical risks, the most common in 2014 were Chromium VI content in shoes and other leather articles; hazardous plastic softeners detected in toys and childcare articles; and heavy metals in jewelry.
  • Country of Origin. China topped the list of country of origin for notified products, at 64 percent.  In its report, the EC noted that this statistic is consistent with what was seen in 2013 and stressed that it continues to work with the Chinese government and industry to prevent dangerous products from entering the European market. European countries were the second highest point of origin for notified products at 14 percent. The United States was not named on the list. 
  • Notifying Member States. The EU member states most active in submitting RAPEX notifications in 2014 were Hungary (12 percent, 291 notifications); Germany (11 percent, 273 notifications); Spain (11 percent, 272 notifications); France (7 percent, 163 notifications); and Cyprus (6 percent, 151 notifications). 
  • Professional Products. There were 32 RAPEX notices for professional products in 2014, for chemical products (4 notifications); construction products (1 notification); electrical appliances (4 notifications); machinery (7 notifications); motor vehicles (14 notifications); and protective equipment (2 notifications). Germany submitted the most notifications for professional products (17 notifications), then Malta (3 notifications) and the UK (3 notifications).

  • "Other" Notifications. Since 2013, the EC has included notice of risks relating to public interests other than health and safety on RAPEX. The main categories of those risks relate to electromagnetic disturbance, energy consumption, incorrect measurement, and security.
    • In 2014, 62 of these "other" risks were notified on RAPEX.
    • The categories of "other" risks were electromagnetic disturbance (1 notification); environmental (29 notifications); and microbiological (32 notifications).
    • The most active member state reporting these risks was Sweden with 21 notifications followed by Spain with 7 notifications.

Other Articles in this Month's Edition:

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights