1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |EU Antitrust Regulators Raid Intel's Germany Offices

EU Antitrust Regulators Raid Intel's Germany Offices

Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.13.08

Antitrust regulators for the European Union raided Intel Corp.'s Munich, Germany, offices, as well as the offices of several retailers selling Intel products. EU officers carried out unannounced inspections on Tuesday February 12, 2008 at Intel, German-based retailer Media Markt and Britain's DSG Group, owner of Dixons, Currys, PC City and PC World. The commission said it had reason to believe the companies “may have violated EC Treaty rules on restrictive business practices and/or abuse of a dominant market position.”

The raids come as Intel prepares for a hearing in Brussels in March to answer allegations that it abused its dominance of the market for central processing units (CPUs), a major component in personal computers. Intel's response will contest a statement of objections that Europe’s antitrust watchdog fired off against Intel in late July. The EC alleged that the company tried to elbow smaller competitor Advanced Micro Devices Inc. out of the chip industry by enticing computer hardware makers with illegal cash payments, discounts and rebates to choose its chips over AMD’s products.

Regulators accused the company of violating commission rules on abuse of dominant position. The commission said that Intel, which controls 80% of the global market for CPU microchips, engaged in three types of market abuse. “First, Intel has provided substantial rebates to various original equipment manufacturers conditional on them obtaining all or the great majority of their CPU requirements from Intel,” the commission said in July. “Secondly, in a number of instances, Intel made payments in order to induce an OEM to either delay or cancel the launch of a product line incorporating an AMD-based CPU. Thirdly, in the context of bids against AMD-based products for strategic customers in the server segment of the market, Intel has offered CPUs on average below cost.”

Intel may face a fine of as much as 10% of its yearly revenue and a requirement to revise its business practices. The company has denied any wrongdoing and called the EC's statement of objections riddled with errors.

In the United States, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo launched a formal investigation in January into whether the company lured customers away from AMD. Cuomo’s office revealed that the attorney general had served a “wide-ranging” subpoena on Intel, seeking documents and information about whether the company violated New York state and federal antitrust laws by “coercing customers” to exclude AMD from the worldwide market of x86 CPUs. Specifically, Cuomo’s subpoena seeks information about Intel’s pricing practices and any attempts to exclude competitors from the market using its dominant position.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products

On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market....