Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act Imposes New SEC Reporting Requirements on Publicly Traded Mine Operators
Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.17.10
The financial reform law that Congress passed recently includes comprehensive new reporting requirements for publicly held companies that are also mine operators, or that have subsidiaries that are mine operators. The new law will take effect on or before August 20, 2010.
Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires covered companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") certain enforcement actions taken by the Mine Safety and Health Administration ("MSHA"), such as significant and substantial ("S&S"), unwarrantable failure and flagrant violations, closure orders for failure to abate or for an imminent danger, and pattern of violation notices and orders. Companies must also disclose, for the period of the report, the total number of fatalities, the total amount of assessed penalties and information about their cases pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. All of this information must be reported on the SEC's Form 10-Q and Form 10-K on a quarterly basis. In addition, companies must report on SEC Form 8-K within four business days receipt of any imminent danger order, pattern of violations notice or notice of a proposed pattern.
Penalties for willfully failing to make the required disclosures are far greater than penalties for knowing or willful conduct under the Mine Act, and can be as high as $5,000,000 for individuals or $25,000,000 for companies.
The SEC has not issued regulations or other guidance to help companies understand what they must do to comply with these new requirements, and it is unclear whether or when the SEC will do so.
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.19.25
GAO Cautions Agencies—Over-Redact at Your Own Peril
Bid protest practitioners in recent years have witnessed agencies’ increasing efforts to limit the production of documents and information in response to Government Accountability Office (GAO) bid protests—often will little pushback from GAO. This practice has underscored the notable difference in the scope of bid protest records before GAO versus the Court of Federal Claims. However, in Tiger Natural Gas, Inc., B-423744, Dec. 10, 2025, 2025 CPD ¶ __, GAO made clear that there are limits to the scope of redactions, and GAO will sustain a protest where there is insufficient evidence that the agency’s actions were reasonable.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.19.25
In Bid to Ban “Woke AI,” White House Imposes Transparency Requirements on Contractors
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.19.25
Navigating California’s Evolving Microplastics Landscape in 2026
Client Alert | 19 min read | 12.18.25
2025 GAO Bid Protest Annual Report: Where Have All the Protests Gone?
