DoD and GSA Take Aim at Supply Chain Risks
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.15.21
The Department of Defense (DoD) recently implemented additional procedures for the mitigation of cybersecurity risks in its supply chain. Designed to identify and mitigate cybersecurity and related supply chain risks throughout a program’s lifecycle, DoD Instruction 5000.90, Cybersecurity Acquisition Decision Authorities and Program Managers, requires program managers to:
- Assess contractors’ cybersecurity posture, including, where applicable, verifying compliance with the DoD’s newly introduced Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC);
- Consider the extent to which contractors have experienced “significant” incidents resulting in network breaches or data loss;
- Avoid program requirements that may necessitate the use of contractors or suppliers that are owned or controlled by a foreign adversary government or are subject to the jurisdiction of a foreign adversary government;
- Manage any supply chain risks associated with foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI); and
- Mitigate supply chain risks using a framework that prescribes escalating risk management actions across four risk tolerance levels.
Alongside the DoD, the General Services Administration (GSA) recently introduced, as part of a draft solicitation for the Polaris small business government-wide IT contract, its own Vendor Risk Assessment Program (VRAP). According to the draft solicitation, the VRAP is designed to identify, assess, and monitor supply chain risks associated with FOCI, cybersecurity, and other factors, such as financial performance.
Contacts

Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.24.25
On October 23rd, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) sent a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) containing an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (“ANOPR”) with principles for all large load interconnections across the US, including those co-located with generating facilities.[1] Significantly, the Secretary of Energy states that the interconnection of large loads to the transmission system “falls squarely” within FERC’s jurisdiction, thus weighing in on a dispute that has been pending before FERC for over a year. This move appears to be a reaction to the continued pendency before FERC of the colocation dockets[2] and a technical conference on colocation held almost a year ago.[3]
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.24.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 10.24.25
Will Jarkesy Stop the IRS from Asserting Penalties Against Taxpayers?
Client Alert | 3 min read | 10.23.25
Are You Ready for the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act? Key Changes for Businesses


