1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DoD Proposes Limitations & Prohibitions on Use of LPTA Source Selection Process

DoD Proposes Limitations & Prohibitions on Use of LPTA Source Selection Process

Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.11.18

Implementing a Department of Defense (DoD) policy preference against the use of lowest priced technically-acceptable (LPTA) procurements that was codified in the National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs) for fiscal year 2017 and 2018, last week, the DoD issued a proposed rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to reflect the limitations and prohibitions in the NDAA provisions. 

Of note, the proposed rule would add DFARS 215.101-2-70, which sets forth the eight scenarios under which LPTA source selection procedures can be used, such as when the proposed technical approaches will require no, or minimal, subjective judgment by the source selection authority as to the desirability of one offeror’s proposal versus a competing proposal. The proposed rule makes clear that the limitations and prohibitions (e.g., the prohibition against using, to the maximum extent possible, LPTA procurement for the acquisition of IT and cybersecurity services and systems engineering and technical engineering services) apply to several types of acquisitions including, but not limited to, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15 procedures for negotiation, acquisitions for commercial items under FAR Part 12, and simplified acquisition procedures using FAR Part 13.

Contractors should be aware of these new restrictions and have until February 4, 2019 to submit comments to be considered in the formation of the final rule.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....