"Disparate Impact" Theory Available In Age Discrimination Cases
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 04.07.05
Resolving a split in the circuit courts, a divided Supreme Court in Smith v. City of Jackson, (Mar. 30, 2005) held that the "disparate impact" theory of liability, which does not require a showing of discriminatory intent, applies to claims asserted under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). However, the Court noted that "the scope of disparate-impact liability under ADEA is narrower" than under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, due to statutory language in ADEA that permits employers to take "otherwise prohibited" employment action where the "differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age," such as seniority or rank.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.09.25
FDA Seeks Stakeholder Consultation on Prescription Drug User Fee Reauthorization
On May 8, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took steps to begin the process for reauthorizing the Prescription Drug User Fee Amendments (PDUFA) by announcing a public meeting to be held on July 14, 2025. The agency invited public stakeholders, including patient and consumer advocate groups, health care professionals, and scientific and academic experts to participate in the meeting and subsequent public meetings to consult on the PDUFA reauthorization.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.09.25
New SF-328 for Foreign Ownership, Control, and Influence Assessments Approved, Publication Imminent
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.08.25
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.07.25
