1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Department of Defense Issues Defense Industrial Base Memorandum

Department of Defense Issues Defense Industrial Base Memorandum

Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.20.20

Following the March 19, 2020 guidance issued by the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency (CISA) on “essential” critical infrastructure workers during COVID-19, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a memorandum today reiterating that the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) is identified as a critical infrastructure sector by DHS, and that those who work in such sectors are expected to maintain normal work schedules.  The DHS guidance identified the DIB essential critical infrastructure workforce as those who provide “essential services to meet national security commitments,” including aerospace; mechanical and software engineers; manufacturing/production workers; IT support; security staff; security personnel; intelligence support; aircraft and weapon systems mechanics and maintainers; suppliers of medical supplies and pharmaceuticals; and critical transportation.  The DoD memorandum adds some additional details, stating that DoD contracts and subcontracts that support the development, production, testing, fielding or sustainment of weapons systems/software systems or the manning, training, equipping, deploying, or support of military forces, are considered essential critical infrastructure that should maintain normal work schedules.

However, DoD contracts and subcontracts that support tasks such as providing office supplies, recreations support or lawn care are not considered essential.  DoD notes that it will continue to assess conditions, and that companies should continue to follow guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as well as State and local government officials regarding strategies to contain the spread of COVID-19.  Crowell & Moring is standing by to assist with COVID-related questions.

Insights

Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.26.24

Banks and Financial Service Providers Take Note: EU Law on Greenwashing and Social-Washing Is Changing – And It Is Likely Going to Have a Wide Impact

The amount of litigation regarding environmental and climate change issues is, perhaps unsurprisingly, growing worldwide.[1] A significant portion of that litigation relates to so-called ‘greenwashing’, ‘climate-washing’ or ‘social-washing’ disputes. In other words, legal cases where people or organisations (often NGOs and consumer groups) accuse companies, banks, financial institutions or others, of making untrue statements. They argue these companies or financial institutions are pretending their products, services or operations are more environmentally-friendly, sustainable, or ethically ‘good’ for society – than is really the case. Perhaps more interestingly, of all the litigation in the environmental and climate change space – complainants bringing greenwashing and social washing cases have, according to some of these reports, statistically the most chance of winning. So, in a nutshell, not only is greenwashing and social washing litigation on the rise, companies and financial institutions are most likely to lose cases in this area....