Declarant’s Intentional Misrepresentation Not Remedied By Contradictory Supporting Exhibits
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.26.07
In eSpeed, Inc. v. Brokertec USA, L.L.C., (No. 06-1385; March 20, 2007), the Federal Circuit affirms the district court’s judgment declaring a patent unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. eSpeed submitted three declarations and 1139 pages of supporting exhibits disclosing a prior system implemented by eSpeed. One of the declarations stated that the prior system did not include computer code that implements particular trading rules. The supporting exhibits, however, disclosed that the system included computer code for implementing those trading rules. Rejecting eSpeed’s argument the contradictory supporting exhibits vitiated the materiality of the false statements, the Federal Circuit holds that these false statements left the examiner with the impression that further investigation into the operation of the system was not required.
Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 07.16.25
In our first alert in this weekly series on the EU Pharma Package we provided some important background and general information about the status of the Pharma Package and how the trilogues work, and in the second alert we discussed the proposed changes to regulatory data protection.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.15.25
Client Alert | 10 min read | 07.15.25
Fueling The Future: Understanding The EU’s Clean Industrial Deal State Aid Framework (CISAF)
Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.14.25
The European Commission issues competition guidance in the transport sector
