1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DOL Overtime Rules Enjoined

DOL Overtime Rules Enjoined

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.23.16

A federal district judge in Texas yesterday issued a nationwide preliminary injunction barring the U.S. Department of Labor from implementing new regulations increasing the minimum salary necessary for employees to qualify for many of the “white collar” overtime exemptions permitted under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The rule was scheduled to be effective next Thursday, December 1. The DOL issued a statement yesterday that it disagreed with the decision and was considering all options. An emergency appeal of the court’s order is possible.

The decision will cause most employers to reassess their plans to comply with the new rule. Many companies have initiated compliance programs that call for increasing salaries of affected employees. Other plans are intended to convert employees to non-exempt status, making them eligible for overtime pay. Complex financial, operational and human resources issues are presented by the court’s order.

The court’s decision adopted the principal arguments advanced by plaintiffs in two consolidated cases brought in September challenging the DOL rule. The court concluded that DOL lacked authority under the FLSA to issue the new rule. According to the court, the new rule effectively adopted a “salary-only” test for FLSA exemption status, a result that is contrary to the FLSA’s requirement that DOL “define and delimit” the white collar exemptions with reference to the job duties actually performed by affected employees.

We are closely following developments in the litigation. We’re also working with clients on how to respond to the uncertainty created by yesterday’s ruling. Watch this space for additional updates.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.10.26

ASBCA Denies Government Motion to Dismiss, Providing Key Guidance on Contractor Claim Standards Post-ECC International

In Appeal of Bahadir (a C&M case), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals denied the government’s motion to dismiss in its entirety, ruling in favor of the contractor on both key issues raised by the government. The case arises from a contract for construction work at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, under which Appellant alleged government-caused delay and filed certified prolongation claims using a “windows analysis” methodology. The government moved to dismiss, arguing that Appellant failed to state a sum certain for each of what the government characterized as 38 distinct claims, and separately that four claims had not been properly presented to the Contracting Officer. ...

View All Insights