DOL Compliance Guidance for Health Plans
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.15.03
The Department of Labor (DOL) has initiated a compliance assistance program to help employers, health plans and health insurers satisfy the requirements of certain federal health laws, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Mental Health Parity Act, the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act, and the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. In general, health plans covered by ERISA are subject to these laws, with certain limited exceptions for small businesses.
The HIPAA Compliance Assistance Program (H-CAP) is designed to address specific compliance issues. H-CAP is one of a number of programs sponsored by the DOL and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to encourage and assist benefit plans with voluntary compliance with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. H-CAP consists of three major parts:
(1) new DOL publications designed to assist group health plans and health insurers comply with the laws,
(2) a new section of the DOL's Web page devoted to health law material at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/compliance_assistance.html#section2, and
(3) DOL sponsorship of compliance assistance workshops around the U.S.
The new publications include a self-audit checklist for plans and employers; a guide summarizing the notice requirements of the various laws, including sample language; and tips for avoiding the 15 most common mistakes made by health plans and their sponsors. The list includes such matters as "hidden" pre-existing condition limitations, timely provision of special enrollment notices and certificates of creditable coverage and non-confinement clauses.
In light of DOL's increasing audit activity in the health plan area, these tools are a useful starting point to monitor plan compliance, but are not a substitute for a full HIPAA compliance review.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact your regular Crowell & Moring contact or any attorney on our Health Care team.
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.14.25
Claim construction is a key stage of most patent litigations, where the court must decide the meaning of any disputed terms in the patent claims. Generally, claim terms are given their plain and ordinary meaning except under two circumstances: (1) when the patentee acts as its own lexicographer and sets out a definition for the term; and (2) when the patentee disavows the full scope of the term either in the specification or during prosecution. Thorner v. Sony Comput. Ent. Am. LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012). The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Aortic Innovations LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. highlights that patentees can act as their own lexicographers through consistent, interchangeable usage of terms across the specification, effectively defining terms by implication.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.14.25
Microplastics Update: Regulatory and Litigation Developments in 2025
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.13.25
