1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DOJ Signals That It Will Increase FCA Enforcement to Curb Opioid Crisis in the Most Meritorious Cases

DOJ Signals That It Will Increase FCA Enforcement to Curb Opioid Crisis in the Most Meritorious Cases

Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.13.18

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has signaled that it will increase its use of the False Claims Act (FCA) to address the opioid crisis. Addressing the Federal Bar Association’s Qui Tam Conference on February 28th, Deputy Associate Attorney General Stephen Cox stated that the FCA “provides the government with a powerful tool to pursue all of those in the opioid distribution chain that are responsible for the improper marketing, distribution, prescription and diversion of opioids” and that it is a tool that DOJ is “increasingly using to address the opioid crisis.” Mr. Cox also emphasized that the department would only focus on the most meritorious cases. He referred to the Brand Memo, issued earlier this year, to reiterate that DOJ would not use agency guidance to create legal obligations in FCA enforcement. He also alluded to the Granston Memo from January, which contains internal department guidelines for exercising dismissal authority of qui tam cases. Mr. Cox concluded that DOJ “takes its responsibility seriously” and will move to dismiss “where necessary to protect the long-term interests of both the government and relators.” (A full transcript of the address can be found here).

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products

On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market....