1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DCAA's Use of a Statistically Invalid Analysis for Testing Compensation Reasonableness

DCAA's Use of a Statistically Invalid Analysis for Testing Compensation Reasonableness

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 02.03.12

The ASBCA in J.F. Taylor, Inc. (Jan. 18, 2012) rejected DCAA’s disallowance of executive compensation, based primarily on the credibility of differing expert opinions. The board concluded that the standard DCAA analysis relying on a “rule of reason” that permits compensation within 10% of the 50th percentile of an unweighted average of multiple surveys with different sample sizes is statistically invalid, at least in part because the contractor’s expert was credible and the government’s, who had included in his resume what was arguably a mail order PhD from a South African “university,” was not.

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 01.16.26

Trump Administration Rolls Out New DOJ Division for National Fraud Enforcement

On January 8, 2026, the Trump Administration announced the creation of a new Division for National Fraud Enforcement within the Department of Justice (DOJ). The division will be led by a newly appointed Assistant Attorney General (AAG), pending Senate confirmation, who will report directly to both the President and Vice President and operate out of the White House. Such a reporting structure is unprecedented in the history of the DOJ....