Cyber Commission Seeks Public Comments on Enhancing Cybersecurity in the Digital Economy
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.12.16
Six months ago, the Obama Administration embarked on an ambitious Cybersecurity National Action Plan, including the establishment of the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity to craft recommendations to the President for improving cybersecurity across the public and private sectors. This week, the Commission took what is expected to be the first of many steps to make good on that mandate. The Commission, in conjunction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking comments on a wide-range of topics relevant to cybersecurity in the evolving "digital economy." Interested parties will need to act quickly, with comments due no later than September 9, 2016.
The Commission is specifically seeking input on "current and future cybersecurity challenges," and "promising and innovative solutions to address those challenges" for a variety of topics, including
- Critical infrastructure cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity insurance
- Cybersecurity research and development
- Federal governance
- Identity and access management
- International markets
- Internet of things
The Commission is also seeking input on a broad range of cybersecurity-related issues, including the impact of emerging technology, economic and other incentives for cybersecurity improvements, and government-private sector coordination and cooperation on cybersecurity. Notably, the Commission wants to "build on successful existing cybersecurity policies [and] public-private partnerships" and seeks "input from those who have experienced significant cybersecurity incidents to understand lessons learned from these experiences, including identifying any barriers to awareness, risk management, and investment."
The RFI, like the Commission's mandate, recognizes the importance of continuing to "bolster[] partnerships between Federal, State, and local government and the private sector," consistent with the White House's earlier information-sharing initiatives. Comments submitted in response to the RFI will likely inform the Commission's eventual recommendations, which are due to the President by December 1, 2016, and will be made public 45 days after that submission.
The NIST information request thus presents an opportunity for companies to help shape the cybersecurity dialogue in the coming years, share best practices developed over time in the private sector, and anticipate and manage risks associated with current and future business opportunities in both the public and private sectors.
Contacts

Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
