Court of Federal Claims Grants Summary Judgment on $214 Million ACA "Risk Corridors" Claim
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.10.17
In Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. U.S. (Feb. 9, 2017), the Court of Federal Claims granted summary judgment in favor of a health insurer in a lawsuit seeking to recover "risk corridors" payments pursuant to §1342 of the Affordable Care Act, deciding on the merits that (i) the plaintiff was entitled to full payments owed to it under the statutory formula set forth in the ACA, (ii) Congress did not intend the risk corridors program to be budget-neutral, and (iii) later appropriations bills restricting HHS' access to the CMS Program Management Account for risk corridors payments did not repeal or amend this obligation to make full annual payments. In an important decision likely to reverberate throughout the individual insurance market, the Court stated that "the Government made a promise in the risk corridors program that it has yet to fill … [and] the Court directs the Government to fulfill that promise."
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.14.25
Claim construction is a key stage of most patent litigations, where the court must decide the meaning of any disputed terms in the patent claims. Generally, claim terms are given their plain and ordinary meaning except under two circumstances: (1) when the patentee acts as its own lexicographer and sets out a definition for the term; and (2) when the patentee disavows the full scope of the term either in the specification or during prosecution. Thorner v. Sony Comput. Ent. Am. LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012). The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Aortic Innovations LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. highlights that patentees can act as their own lexicographers through consistent, interchangeable usage of terms across the specification, effectively defining terms by implication.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.14.25
Microplastics Update: Regulatory and Litigation Developments in 2025
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.13.25
