Chutzpah Goes Unrewarded
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 02.24.06
The contractor in Armour of Am. v. U.S. (CFC Feb. 14, 2006) alleged "no cause of action" when it argued that it should not have been terminated for default when it was obvious from its offer that it could not meet the mandatory requirements of the RFP/contract and the FAR required the agency to reject nonconforming offers. Still alive, though, is the issue of whether the agency breached its good faith duties by making the award with actual knowledge of the nonconformity and then defaulting early on in the program.
Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 07.16.25
In our first alert in this weekly series on the EU Pharma Package we provided some important background and general information about the status of the Pharma Package and how the trilogues work, and in the second alert we discussed the proposed changes to regulatory data protection.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.15.25
Client Alert | 5 min read | 07.14.25
The European Commission issues competition guidance in the transport sector
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.14.25
Trump v. Casa: Nationwide Injunctions And The Class Action Loophole
