CPSC Unanimously Approves Policy Statement On Tracking Labels Requirement for Children's Products in Section 103(a) of the CPSIA
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.22.09
On July 20, 2009, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) unanimously approved the draft Statement of Policy relating to the tracking label requirement in Section 103(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA). Section 103(a) requires manufacturers and importers to place permanent distinguishing marks on children's products and their packaging to the extent practicable to enable manufacturers and consumers to ascertain certain manufacturing and source information for these products. The tracking label requirement applies to children's products manufactured after August 14, 2009.
The CPSC's Statement of Policy on the tracking label requirement includes the following key points:
- Other than what is included in the text of CPSIA Section 103(a), there are no uniform requirements for tracking labels. The CPSC expects manufacturers to use their best judgment in developing the appropriate permanent distinguishing marks to satisfy the requirements of Section 103(a).
- "Label" need not be interpreted as a single collection of information in one location. Rather, the totality of permanent distinguishing marks on the product and packaging can satisfy the tracking labels requirement.
- Manufacturers may use codes and numbering systems (though they are not required) as long as consumers can ascertain the required information.
- The CPSC has stated that it anticipates some period of education once Section 103(a) goes into effect. Therefore, the CPSC is unlikely to penalize manufacturers for noncompliance where they make good faith efforts to educate themselves and the noncompliance is inadvertent.
- The CPSC recognized six examples where marking the product itself (as opposed to the packaging) may not be practicable:
- If a product is too small in size to be marked;
- If a toy is stored in packaging, such as a game with many pieces (the larger pieces must be marked but the smaller pieces need not be marked);
- If a product is sold in bulk (individual items do not need to be marked, but the package or cartons in which the items were originally shipped must be marked);
- If the label will weaken the product, damage the product, or impair the product's utility;
- If the product surface cannot be permanently marked;
- If the label will ruin the product's aesthetics and the label cannot be placed in an inconspicuous location.
- If a product is too small in size to be marked;
CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum and Commissioners Thomas Moore and Nancy Nord each issued individual statements on the ballot vote.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.10.26
European Commission Publishes Landmark Guidelines on Exclusionary Abuses by Dominant Companies
On 3 September 2026, the European Commission adopted new Guidelines on the application of Article 102 TFEU to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings. The Guidelines follow a public consultation on a draft published in August 2024 and reflect substantial stakeholder feedback. They replace the Commission's 2008 Guidance on enforcement priorities (which ceases to apply 30 days after publication of the new guidelines in the Official Journal) and represent the most significant reset of the Commission's Article 102 enforcement framework in nearly two decades. The Commission's stated aim is to set out principles and operational guidance, enhance legal certainty, and help companies self-assess their exclusionary-abuse risk.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 09.09.26
Client Alert | 8 min read | 09.08.26
Saxon Woods Investments Limited v Costa [2026] UKSC 21: Good Faith in the Boardroom
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.08.26
IRS Takes Aim: Proposed Rule Threatens Tax-Exempt Status of Private Schools
