1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Bid Protests Workshop: Practice, Procedure and Strategy

Bid Protests Workshop: Practice, Procedure and Strategy

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 02.28.11

In a full-day workshop for Federal Publications Seminars on March 17th entitled "Government Contracts Bid Protests: Practice, Procedure and Strategy," (http://www.fedpubseminars.com/Basics/Government-Contracts-Bid-Protests-Practice-Procedure-and-Strategy/), experienced bid protest practitioners Amy O'Sullivan and Puja Satiani will explain the key advance-planning, decision-making, litigation, and litigation-avoidance practice pointers for protests before an agency, the Government Accountability Office, and the Court of Federal Claims.  Space is limited, so reserve your seat today. 

Insights

Client Alert | 2 min read | 11.14.25

Defining Claim Terms by Implication: Lexicography Lessons from Aortic Innovations LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

Claim construction is a key stage of most patent litigations, where the court must decide the meaning of any disputed terms in the patent claims.  Generally, claim terms are given their plain and ordinary meaning except under two circumstances: (1) when the patentee acts as its own lexicographer and sets out a definition for the term; and (2) when the patentee disavows the full scope of the term either in the specification or during prosecution.  Thorner v. Sony Comput. Ent. Am. LLC, 669 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2012).  The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Aortic Innovations LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp. highlights that patentees can act as their own lexicographers through consistent, interchangeable usage of terms across the specification, effectively defining terms by implication....