Awards Reinstated After Faulty 'Corrective Action'
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 04.11.14
In WHR Group, Inc. v. U.S. (Apr. 8, 2008), the Court of Federal Claims set aside an agency's "corrective action" terminating three blanket purchase agreements for employee relocation services because that action was not narrowly tailored to address the flaw in the underlying procurement. While the agency cited a laundry list of reasons for why it believed termination and reprocurement was necessary, Judge Block rejected nearly all of them and, as to the one issue that legitimately raised a concern about the prior evaluation, he concluded that a reevaluation would address the problem without a full resolicitation.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.21.26
Securities Law for Entrepreneurs
Do you want your startup to expand and become a major player in your industry? If so, you will most likely need to seek capital from outside investors to help you build infrastructure and fulfill orders.
Client Alert | 12 min read | 09.30.26
From Process to Principles: Federal Regulators Propose a New Third-Party Risk Management Framework
Client Alert | 2 min read | 09.30.26
The COMPETE Act Becomes Law – What the New Antitrust Law Means For California Businesses
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.29.26
Federal Circuit Resolves Court Split Over IDIQ Awardee Standing
