Army Can't Bypass Competition Without Court Scrutiny
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 02.18.04
Noting the Army "may not disregard" legal constraints "under the auspices of an unusual and compelling urgency," the Court of Federal Claims, in Filtration Development Co. v. U.S. (Feb. 3, 2004), held that a court can review an Army decision to bypass competitive procedures on the basis of "urgent and compelling circumstances" even when those circumstances – rapid deterioration of helicopters in Iraq – involve military needs of mobilized forces. The court rejected the argument that it had no standards against which to review the Army decision, stating that it could review the Army's written justification for rationality and the "fact that the ultimate destination . . . is Iraq does not alter this proposition."
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.13.25
FTC and NAD Enforcement Priorities & ANA 2025
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs laid out their enforcement priorities during the 2025 ANA Masters of Advertising Law Conference, at which Crowell & Moring attorneys spoke on and attended various panels.
Client Alert | 12 min read | 11.13.25
Highlighting Key Takeaways from the Pentagon Acquisition Transformation Strategy
Client Alert | 4 min read | 11.13.25
The Password is “Louvre” – Lessons for Everyone from the Louvre’s Jewel Heist
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.12.25
EPA Proposes Important Revisions to its PFAS Reporting Regulations
