1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Aon Launches Cryptocurrency Pilot

Aon Launches Cryptocurrency Pilot

Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.04.21

This week, global re/insurance broker Aon announced the launch of a “first of its kind” cryptocurrency pilot that utilizes blockchain technology in the placement of insurance with regulated, professional insurance entities. 

Aon is collaborating with Nayms Ltd., an insurtech platform for insuring risk, particularly cryptocurrency risks. The Nayms platform allows crypto-investors to cover risk (in the pilot case here, risk of digital asset theft or fraud) in return for a yield, by holding collateral in smart contracts. As applied to cryptocurrency insurance, this eliminates the volatility between the currency of the insurance protection and the currency of the risk, thereby eliminating the need for policies to price in the risk of uncertainty in fluctuation of the value of crypto assets. Policies for crypto-assets are thus less expensive and can scale as the cryptocurrency market expands. By bringing together investors whose collateral will be used to insure specialized risks, the Nayms Ltd. insurtech platform is arguably a modern variant of how the Lloyd’s of London insurance market used to operate. In the Lloyd’s of London market, pools of individuals, known as “Lloyd’s names,” provided the financial backing for the risks assumed by Lloyd’s underwriters. “Nayms” is a play on the “Lloyd’s names” moniker. 

Also collaborating in the newly-announced cryptocurrency pilot is Relm, a Bermuda specialist insurer, that will underwrite the contracts. The first pilot will be conducted with Teller Finance, a decentralized lending protocol. 

According to Benjamin Peach, Associate Director & Digital Assets Specialist, Global Broking Centre at Aon, this pilot is “the first step to creating a platform for digital asset companies to scale up their cover efficiently and cost effectively as the market continues to expand.” Dan Roberts, CEO at Nayms, explained: “As the digital asset space soars to $1 trillion, the need for appropriate insurance protection to scale alongside that growth will be vital for the sustainability of this innovative market. By working with Aon and Relm, we are enabling collaboration between technology, regulation and the existing insurance marketplace, bringing a robust solution for the cover of digital asset risk to the market." And Joseph Ziolkowski, CEO at Relm, said: “In addition to supporting numerous digital asset companies all over the world with financial and professional lines coverage, the Nayms platform will enable Relm and Aon to transact insurance in a manner that creates more alignment with our target insureds.”

Crowell & Moring is helping clients understand the most promising uses of cryptocurrency and blockchain, whether they are developers and vendors seeking to capture new opportunities, or companies and end users that are considering joining or deploying blockchain networks.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights