ASBCA Hears Past Performance Evaluation Challenges
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 07.19.10
In Appeal of Colonna's Shipyard, Inc. (June 24, 2010), the ASBCA confirmed, consistent with recent CFC decisions in Todd Construction, L.P. v. U.S., 88 Fed. Cl. 34, 235 (2008), that it has jurisdiction to review claims challenging inaccurate past performance evaluations under the Contract Disputes Act. Thus, the way is clear for contractors to challenge DOD past performance evaluations in either forum.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 11.24.25
Draft Executive Order Seeks to Short-Circuit AI State Regulation
