1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |'A Higher Ethical Obligation?' State Revenue Execs Speak Out in Crowell's Conversations

'A Higher Ethical Obligation?' State Revenue Execs Speak Out in Crowell's Conversations

Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.15.14

Crowell & Moring's state tax team traveled from coast to coast in 2013 to introduce the corporate world to 10 of the country's top state tax decision makers. In Crowell's Conversations – a monthly column appearing in Bloomberg BNA's Weekly State Tax Report – we bring you timely and candid observations from different states' commissioners and their counsel. The revenue executives discussed everything from litigation and policy-making to resources and technology to their personal careers. While the questions and responses differed in each column, a common theme last year was the core belief that the states have a higher ethical obligation to get to the "right" answer rather than to collect the most revenue. We hope you have enjoyed getting to know our friends in the state revenue departments, and we look forward to bringing you more great interviews in 2014. Below are links to the first nine interviews. 

  • Michael Bryan, Director of the New Jersey Division of Taxation (December 6, 2013).

  • Jozel Brunett, California Franchise Tax Board Chief Counsel (November 8, 2013).

  • Julie Magee, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Revenue (August 30, 2013).

  • Tim Barfield, Secretary at the Louisiana Department of Revenue (July 19, 2013).

  • Barbara Brohl, Executive Director and John Vecchiarelli, Senior Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue (June 21, 2013).

  • Marshall Stranburg, Executive Director at the Florida Department of Revenue (May 3, 2013).

  • Peter Franchot, Comptroller of Maryland (April 12, 2013).

  • Milton Kimpson, General Counsel to the South Carolina Department of Revenue (March 15, 2013).

  • Alan Levine, Chief Counsel With the District of Columbia's Office of Tax and Revenue (February 15, 2013).

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26

FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know

On August 19, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing — the practice of companies using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, discounts, coupons, or other incentives. The proposed statement, which is open for public comment for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, marks a major step up in the FTC’s focus on data-driven pricing strategies and puts businesses across industries on notice that undisclosed or inadequately disclosed personalized pricing will not be tolerated. Importantly, while the proposed statement is not a binding legal requirement and does not create new legal obligations, it serves as an enforcement warning that the FTC is prepared to use its existing enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (Section 5) and is also a potential harbinger of rulemaking. Businesses that engage in — or are considering — personalized pricing should carefully assess their disclosure practices and data collection procedures against the standards articulated in this statement....

View All Insights