1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Prosecutors in New York and Texas Charge Individuals for Defrauding COVID-19 Relief Programs

Prosecutors in New York and Texas Charge Individuals for Defrauding COVID-19 Relief Programs

Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.22.20

Federal authorities continue to prioritize and aggressively pursue individuals across the country who seek to exploit coronavirus relief programs meant to aid small businesses and their employees. Over the past week, Muge Ma of New York and Samuel Yates of Texas were arrested, each for submitting multiple fraudulent applications for COVID-19 relief through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Both men obtained loan proceeds before their schemes were uncovered.

Ma allegedly made fraudulent applications for $20 million in loans from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and at least five private banks, claiming that he employed hundreds of people at his two businesses with monthly payrolls in the millions. In actuality, he was the sole employee at each company. Along with his applications, Ma submitted false payroll records, financial statements, bank records and tax records. He was granted $500,000 for one company and $150,000 for the other from the SBA before his scheme was uncovered. Ma was also awarded $800,000 by a private bank in a loan backed by the PPP, which was ultimately frozen. On May 21, 2020, he was charged in the Southern District of New York with bank fraud, wire fraud, and making false statements to a financial institution. 

Yates, for his part, allegedly submitted two fraudulent applications for SBA-backed PPP loans. In the first, he sought $5 million by falsely claiming that he employed 400 individuals with a $2 million monthly payroll. In the second, he claimed to have 100 employees. In fact, Yates’ purported business had no employees. Each application was supported by falsified lists of employees created by a random name generator that is publicly available on the internet and forged tax records. Yates received a $500,000 plus loan in connection with his second application. On May 19, 2020, he was charged in the Eastern District of Texas with bank fraud, wire fraud, making false statements to a financial institution, and making false statements to the SBA.

Both arrests were the result of coordinated efforts among agencies including the Justice Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, the Small Business Administration Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Immigration and Custom’s Homeland Security Investigations, and local authorities.

While the government has seemingly gone after the low-hanging fruit—glaringly fraudulent loan applications—in the early stages of its PPP oversight, businesses and corporate leaders should take note that stimulus fraud is being prosecuted aggressively across the country. Additional prosecutions will inevitably follow. Moreover, the coordinated, interagency efforts across jurisdictions demonstrate that prosecutors and regulators have the will and the resources to root out fraud on all scales.

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.08.26

CAS Board Publishes Final Rule Rescinding CAS 404, 408, 409, and 4117

As part of its ongoing effort to conform the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the CAS Board published a final rule rescinding CAS 408 (Accounting for costs of compensated personal absence) and CAS 411 (Accounting for acquisition costs of material).  The CAS Board also rescinded CAS 404 (Capitalization of tangible assets) and CAS 409 (Depreciation of tangible capital assets) but retained certain requirements of CAS 404 and 409, which will be located in new paragraphs of CAS 405 (Accounting for unallowable costs).  Specifically, the CAS Board retained the requirements currently located at CAS 404-50(d)(1), CAS 409-50(e)(5), CAS 409-50(j)(1), and CAS 409-50(j)(4), which the CAS Board explained are necessary to protect the Government’s interests.  Otherwise, the CAS Board determined that the requirements of CAS 404, 408, 409, and 411 overlapped with GAAP such that GAAP “may be applied reasonably as a substitute for CAS to support contract cost and pricing.”...