New York State Prohibits “No Fault” Attendance Policies
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.23.22
New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed new legislation on November 21, 2022 amending Section 215.1(a) of the New York Labor Law to ban “no-fault” attendance policies by prohibiting employers from punishing employees or subjecting them to discipline for their lawful absences. This law intends “[t]o ensure that it shall be retaliation for an employer to discipline workers by assessing point or deductions from a timebank when an employee has used any legally protected absence.” The amendment take effect on February 19, 2023.
Employers typically establish attendance policies to address concerns of absenteeism in the workplace, and often employ a points system in order to monitor attendance. If employees accrue a certain number of points, occurrences or other demerits, they may be subject to discipline. Under New York State’s new law, such policies that treat all absences, including absences for lawful reasons, the same are prohibited.
The new legislation amends the existing New York State Labor Law anti-retaliation provision to explicitly prohibit discharging, threatening, penalizing, discriminating or retaliating against an employee for taking any legally protected absence pursuant to federal, local, or state law. Legally protected absences include family or medial leave, disability-related absences, or leave for religious needs.
The amendment also expands the prohibited bases of discrimination or retaliation under Article 7 of the General Provisions of the New York Labor Law, Section 215.1(a), to include “assessing any demerit, occurrence, any other point, or deductions from an allotted bank of time, which subjects or could subject an employee to disciplinary action, which may include but not be limited to failure to receive a promotion or loss of pay.”
Employers who maintain absence control or “no-fault” attendance policies will need to review, and if necessary revise, their policies before the new law takes effect on February 19, 2023.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
