Value of Services Performed Must Be Considered in Fraud Case
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 05.02.16
On April 28, the Fifth Circuit found in U.S. v. Harris that the government must take into account the value of the work performed in assessing damages in procurement fraud cases, even when sentencing individuals. In a perhaps unique fact pattern, the court upheld the conviction for 16 counts of wire fraud, but overturned the two-year prison sentence of an Army colonel because the government had calculated damages based on the full $1.3 million value of the contracts, rather than properly reducing that total for the value of the work performed.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.11.26
On March 3, 2026, a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general and state charity regulators (the “States”) sent a letter[1]to GoFundMe expressing their concerns about GoFundMe's creation of donation web pages for more than 1.4 million charities without their prior knowledge or consent.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.11.26
Civil Litigation as a First-Response Strategy: The UK Government's Fraud Strategy 2026–2029
Client Alert | 5 min read | 03.11.26
CJEU Sets the Bar Low for Evidence Disclosure in Competition Damages Litigation
Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.11.26
